andrewreff.com / Portfolio, 2025–26
Build a portfolio that behaves like the work it shows: a living interface you can ask questions of, not a gallery of screenshots.
Before you readThis is the story of the previous site, 2025 to 2026: the one that earned an Awwwards Honorable Mention (March 2026) and GSAP Site of the Day. You are looking at its successor, so the second cursor and the draggable headline described here are not on this page.

Everyone reads it the same way: scan the grid, open a case study, leave. Nothing about the format shows how a designer thinks in the moment.
I gave the site a voice and a second cursor. Ask it anything, by text or out loud, and watch it annotate its own pages as you move.
Every interaction was built by hand: the particle grid, the perspective scroll, the card deck, the voice. The site became its own case study.
The assumption behind this site: recruiters and hiring managers give a portfolio about a minute. A static case study makes them read; nothing lets them ask. The previous site showed none of the three things I most wanted a principal-level role to see: product thinking, motion craft and AI experience design.
I designed and built the site end to end in React, GSAP and Three.js, with content in Sanity and a Claude-backed assistant trained on the portfolio. A site with a point of view: a second cursor called Andy that annotates the page, a hero you can drag, a dot grid that reacts to you, and a conversation by typing or by voice.
A conventional portfolio: a hero, a grid of projects, an about page. Competent, quiet, and indistinguishable from a hundred others. Nothing moved, and nothing answered.
A site people talk about. Visitors ask the assistant about the work in their own words and watch the page annotate itself. Awwwards gave it an Honorable Mention in March 2026, and GSAP named it Site of the Day.
It did what a portfolio is for: it started conversations. The assistant’s logs showed exactly what recruiters wanted to know, which shaped the case studies that followed, and this site.
This site is the next iteration: the same convictions, calmer. One typeface, paper and ink with a single violet, an opening where a cursor turns out to be a person, and the assistant kept. The previous site lives on as the case study you are reading.
The principle I carry forwardA portfolio should start a conversation, not end one.